There is nothing worse then being injured in a Kentucky car accident. You are in pain. You look for a lawyer to guide you and help you deal with the insurance company. You want to get a fair settlement and the best legal advice. Your lawyer sends you to a doctor for treatment. They even arrange for you to fly to another state for surgery. You settle your case and get your settlement money, after your attorney and doctors are paid. This is the way it suppose to go, isn’t it? I would say yes unless you are Sharon Langford.         

We have all seen the billboards and the television commercials about the “aggressive attorneys” formally “Winters, Yonkers and Rousselle” now “Winters and Yonkers”.  Whether you are a fan of this type of legal advertising or not, you have to admit that it works because everyone in Louisville, Kentucky knows the name of this Florida based law firm.  The firm has recently been sued in Jefferson Circuit Court by a former client, Sharon Langford.

            Ms. Langford was injured in a car accident in June of 2008.  She alleges that she was not told that her personal health insurance would potentially pay for her medical bills after her PIP benefits were exhausted. PIP benefits are also known as No-Fault Benefits or Personal Injury Protection. She was referred to a medical care clinic called First Physicians Rehabilitation Inc. by the law firm according to the lawsuit. She was told they would take care of injuries suffered in a car accident.  It is reported that the medical facility did not accept health insurance only PIP car insurance. 

Later when Langford needed surgery the firm flew her to another clinic in Florida.  In the lawsuit Langford states that she discovered later that both clinics were owned by Gary Kompothecras, a chiropractor, who also owns the Hepley advertisement referral service 1?800?ASK?GARY.  Langford also alleges in her lawsuit that the relationship between the law firm and the clinic cost her money.  Her attorney, Sam Carl, states that medical bills paid after PIP totaled over $64,000.00.  Health insurance would have paid a portion of this leaving additional money to Langford after settlement of the lawsuit. You can read the courier journal article that I linked above with further details. 

The question that comes to mind is whether or not the referrals to and between the medical clinic and the law office should be disclosed to clients.  It is alleged that this is a requirement.  I would argue that a client should be referred to the best doctor available and not a doctor that is only referring business to the law firm.  I often refer clients to doctors. Those clients would otherwise have no idea where to go.  I give them the name of several doctors based on their needs.  Many family doctors do not want to handle lawsuits or auto accident suits nor do they understand how to bill car insurance for payment for their medical services. 

The question always comes down to what is best for the client.  Any relationship between a doctor and a lawyer should be disclosed to the client. I will watch with interest Sam Carl’s case to see what direction it does go.  It’s safe to say it should be educational for Kentucky auto accident victims and give them the knowledge they need to ask questions of their attorneys as to the relationship between the attorney and the doctor.